This website uses cookies to improve your browsing experience and enable video and social networking features. The website does NOT collect your personal information and does NOT use tracking cookies to send you advertising messages. By using this website, you agree to receive these cookies on your device. Further information.

You have declined cookies. This decision can be reversed.

You have allowed cookies to be placed on your computer. This decision can be reversed.

Affective basis of Judgment-Behavior Discrepancy in Virtual Experiences of Moral Dilemmas
Authors: Patil I., Cogoni C., Zangrando N., Chittaro L., Silani G.
Published in: Social Neuroscience, Vol. 9, No. 1, January 2014, pp. 94–107.
Abstract: Although research in moral psychology in the last decade has relied heavily on hypothetical moral dilemmas and has been effective in understanding moral judgment, how these judgments translate into behaviors remains a largely unexplored issue due to the harmful nature of the acts involved. To study this link, we follow a new approach based on a desktop virtual reality environment. In our within-subjects experiment, participants exhibited an order-dependent judgment-behavior discrepancy across temporally-separated sessions, with many of them behaving in utilitarian manner in virtual reality dilemmas despite their non-utilitarian judgments for the same dilemmas in textual descriptions. This change in decisions reflected in the autonomic arousal of participants, with dilemmas in virtual reality being perceived more emotionally arousing than the ones in text, after controlling for general differences between the two presentation modalities (virtual reality vs. text). This suggests that moral decision-making in hypothetical moral dilemmas is susceptible to contextual saliency of the presentation of these dilemmas.
Copyright: © Taylor & Francis 2014. This is the Author's Original Manuscript of the article. The definitive form is available at www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17470919.2013.870091